We all have some ideas about what works in software engineering and what doesn’t. But without real evidence and data that is just an opinion. Empirical software engineering tries to answer the question of what can be proven to work in software development. In this episode, Hillel Wayne and Laurent Bossavit will talk about what we know about software development, what we don’t know - and the myths about it i.e. what we think we know but really don’t.
Links
- Laurent’s Book “The Leprechauns of Software Development”
- Derek M. Jones: Evidence-based Software Engineering: based on the publicly available data
- Hillel’s talk “What We Know We Don’t Know”
- Hillel’s consulting
Additional Links
- How students learn
- What we know
- It Will Never Work in Theory: Short summaries of recent results in empirical software engineering research
- Fixing Faults in C and Java Source Code: Abbreviated vs. Full-word Identifier Names
- Recurring opinions or productive improvements—what agile teams actually discuss in retrospectives
- Andy Oram, Greg Wilson: Making Software
- Code Reviews
- Criticism of existing reasearch
- Hillel about “Are We Really Engineers?”
2021-10-25 Thumbnail
YouTube Video
Video bei YouTube
Podcast
This is the audio as a podcast.Information and feeds for the Podcast